While this argument is somewhat counter to my "side" most of the JavaScript extensions are actually quite nice, and will be implemented in WebKit.
==============Original message text=============== On Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:52:46 EST "Kalle Vahlman" wrote: 2009/1/6 Johan Dahlin <jo...@gnome.org>: > Anyway, what subset of JS that's going to be used in the newest and fanciest > web pages seems like a less than ideal criteria to use to select a > javascript engine for GNOME. Instead we should compare what's available, > which will help developers to write great applications *today*. I'd much rather see a *less* extended JS engine in GNOME than adopt the mess of engine-specific JS features that exists in the browser world. But I guess I'm just a day-dreamer ;) -- Kalle Vahlman, z...@iki.fi Powered by http://movial.fiInteresting stuff at http://sandbox.movial.comSee also http://syslog.movial.fi_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list ===========End of original message text=========== _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list