can you build most of the platform out of this? That would be interesting to me. Since I can just point people at that instead of asking them to build completely from git head.
On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Alberto Ruiz <ar...@gnome.org> wrote: > Yes, you can have this in your .jhbuildrc: > > moduleset = ' > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/teams/releng/3.7.4/gnome-apps-3.7.4.modules > ' > [...] > branches['gtk+'] = ('git://git.gnome.org/gtk+', 'master') > > > This way it'll build everything from the point release except for gtk+ > > As I said, it tends to be a lot more stable but if you try to build > something from master that requires something from another master > branch, you'll have to add that to branches[] as well. > > 2013/2/7 meg ford <meg...@gmail.com>: > > Hi Alberto, > > > > So are you saying people should list the last release as the moduleset in > > their ~/.jhbuildrc, and just build a current version of the module they > are > > going to hack on? Or did I not understand what you just said? > > > > Thanks, > > Meg > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Alberto Ruiz <ar...@gnome.org> wrote: > >> > >> Jhbuild does build from tarballs! > >> > >> This is what I'm trying to say, each release has a moduleset for > >> jhbuild with a least of each tarball (have a look at the moduleset on > >> the ftp url I posted). You can configure your jhbuild to use that > >> point release _and_ a single module from git. > >> > >> 2013/2/7 Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me>: > >> > OK, what you're saying is that you get all the modules you want to get > >> > except the one module you want to hack on. You get that from git, and > >> > then > >> > it should work. > >> > > >> > This makes sense because it's not likely going to run into dependency > >> > problems like you would if you get all your packages from the master > >> > packages. > >> > > >> > The downside though is that you have to do a configure;make;make > install > >> > for > >> > a lot of packages. Unless there is some hack on jhbuild to build from > >> > tarballs? > >> > > >> > sri > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 6:35 PM, Alberto Ruiz <ar...@gnome.org> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> If you use the last point release moduleset[0] from tarballs I find > >> >> the experience faster and less error prone. > >> >> > >> >> Then I configure the module I want to hack on to build from master > and > >> >> this usually works, in some weird cases, master requires master from > >> >> another dependency, but this is very rare and addressable case. > >> >> > >> >> [0] ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/teams/releng/3.7.4/ > >> >> > >> >> 2013/2/7 Sriram Ramkrishna <s...@ramkrishna.me>: > >> >> > I'm not sure how I missed this thread.. > >> >> > > >> >> > Regarding maintaining jhbuild up to gtk+ - I would actually like > to > >> >> > see > >> >> > this up to at gnome-shell. We have a number of people who I have > >> >> > convinced > >> >> > to help volunteer to resolve bugs for GNOME 3.7, but are very > >> >> > frustrated > >> >> > with getting jhbuild to build for them. > >> >> > > >> >> > We really should make it a goal to get an SDK for our volunteers to > >> >> > help > >> >> > fix > >> >> > issues. > >> >> > > >> >> > We are considering doing a jhbuild hackfest once a month for > >> >> > volunteers > >> >> > to > >> >> > learn and understand how to build under jhbuild and grow enough > >> >> > builders > >> >> > to > >> >> > make it self sustaining. > >> >> > > >> >> > But getting a certain set of modules always in buildable state is a > >> >> > great > >> >> > goal and I hope we can do this. > >> >> > > >> >> > sri > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:39 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement > >> >> > <jean-baptiste.lallem...@canonical.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 01/16/2013 07:39 AM, Martin Pitt wrote: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Hello Colin, > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> Hi Martin, Colin, > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >>> Colin Walters [2013-01-15 15:34 -0500]: > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> >On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:07 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>>> > >> >> >>>>> > >We have experimented with that a bit, by building > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Raring/view/JHBuild%20Gnome/ > >> >> >>>> > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> >>>> >Interesting! Looks quite useful. Are you doing anything with > >> >> >>>> >respect to the "jhbuild sysdeps --install" infrastructure or is > >> >> >>>> >the system package set maintained manually? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> Right now in our Juju charm it's a manual list: > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~jibel/charms/quantal/jhbuild/trunk/view/head:/files/jhbuild.config/gnome-core.sysdeps > >> >> >>> > >> >> >>> I'm not quite sure why; Jean-Baptiste, did jhbuild sysdeps not > work > >> >> >>> well enough in principle? > >> >> >>> > >> >> >> In Quantal, there was missing dependencies, so I went the > >> >> >> straightest > >> >> >> way > >> >> >> and installed them directly. Now that I have a better > understanding > >> >> >> how > >> >> >> jhbuild works that's something I want to reconsider for Raring and > >> >> >> avoid > >> >> >> maintaining them in 2 different places. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> -- > >> >> >> Jean-Baptiste > >> >> >> IRC: jibel > >> >> >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> >> desktop-devel-list mailing list > >> >> >> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > >> >> >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > _______________________________________________ > >> >> > desktop-devel-list mailing list > >> >> > desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > >> >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Cheers, > >> >> Alberto Ruiz > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> Alberto Ruiz > >> _______________________________________________ > >> desktop-devel-list mailing list > >> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org > >> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Alberto Ruiz >
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
