>> This touches a general unsolved issue: Sharing the maintenance burden of >> deprecated modules across distributors who ship enterprise / long-term >> support versions. Same problem e.g. for gnome-vfs, libgnome, ... >> I guess if somebody offered maintainership, nobody would refuse. > > It's all logistics issues on your side; I don't care about the > community dynamics. > I just care how GNOME community as a whole treat third-party developers. > > It boils down simply to a trivial reference counting issue. "People > urge to have this bug fixed " has nothing to do with "people want to > take over PyGTK".
Did you ask for your money back? Cheers, Debarshi -- If computers are going to revolutionize education, then steam engines and cars and electricity would have done it too. -- Arjun Shankar
pgpJqL9EZZ9VH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
