On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:03:41AM +0300, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote: > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Jasper St. Pierre > <jstpie...@mecheye.net> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Andy Tai <a...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> > >> what would this mean for systems not using systemd? > > > > > > Systems not using systemd already fall back to ConsoleKit, which does not > > have any maintainer. We don't support features like suspend or hibernate on > > ConsoleKit anymore and it's pretty much on life support only at this point. > > > > For 3.12, we will keep the old gnome-session and gdm code that uses > > ConsoleKit and fork/exec ourselves in the case where you compile without > > logind support, but I wouldn't expect it to be around much longer. > > > > Do you have any specific examples of systems not using systemd that you > > would like to run GNOME on? > > > > Did you heard about FreeBSD?
And OpenBSD for that matter. GNOME 3.8 works great: https://www.bsdfrog.org/tmp/gnome.webm -- Antoine _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
