On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) <zeesha...@gnome.org> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Andrew W. Nosenko > <andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:58 PM, Jasper St. Pierre >> <jstpie...@mecheye.net> wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Andy Tai <a...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> what would this mean for systems not using systemd? >>> >>> >>> Systems not using systemd already fall back to ConsoleKit, which does not >>> have any maintainer. We don't support features like suspend or hibernate on >>> ConsoleKit anymore and it's pretty much on life support only at this point. >>> >>> For 3.12, we will keep the old gnome-session and gdm code that uses >>> ConsoleKit and fork/exec ourselves in the case where you compile without >>> logind support, but I wouldn't expect it to be around much longer. >>> >>> Do you have any specific examples of systems not using systemd that you >>> would like to run GNOME on? >>> >> >> Did you heard about FreeBSD? > > How many people use FreeBSD? I doubt its a significant enough number > for us to spend our time and resources on it. > >> PS. Do you know any OS that _uses_ systemd at all beside Linux? > > But apparently its the only free OS worth caring about. I think Jasper > was asking about distros as I'm pretty sure he is well aware that > systemd doesn't run on an archaic OSs, such as FreeBSD.
Sorry it came out so harsh. I only intended to make it clear that Linux is the main (if not, the only) target most GNOME developers focus on. Jasper said it much better. Anyway, apologies. -- Regards, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) FSF member#5124 _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
