The project, not everyfile. It's more like accepting that Nautilus is gpl3+ now
since some files are gpl3+ already. That's what I mean by re licensing.
Best,
Carlos Soriano
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Relicensing Nautilus to GPLv3+
Local Time: May 25, 2017 12:36 PM
UTC Time: May 25, 2017 10:36 AM
From: swil...@gnome.org
To: Carlos Soriano <csori...@protonmail.com>
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org <desktop-devel-list@gnome.org>
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 06:10:56AM -0400, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> I still get different opinions from different people on that. But that
> makes sense to me. Probably makes sense to relicense the files too at
> some point, but that would be a later decision.
> Do you know any advantage of relicensing the files themselves?
Well, I thought you wanted to license Nautilus as GPLv3+, that's the
topic of this thread…
See:
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#v3HowToUpgrade
--
Sébastien
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
