So you mean in firefox 2, the youtube works well?
Kaiwai Gardiner ??:
> On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 19:40 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Sorry to hijack this thread but the performance of Firefox 3.0beta5
>>> has been painful to say the least - I haven't seen the same sort of
>>> performance issues as I did with 2.0.14 - oh, and for some reason
>>> Flash seems to be a major lag creating performance killer - or is
>>> that just normal for Flash on *NIX?
>>>
>> What sort of performace problems are you seeing? Is it possible that
>> since this is Beta software it has many internal diagnostics and
>> validation logic enabled in order to try to find any inconsistencies?
>> If so, that would make it slower.
>>
>> The other issue is of course that almost every major software release
>> is slower than the one that came before. The number of necessary
>> shared libraries tends to multiply like Gerbils since everyone wants
>> their small contribution (requiring another huge library) to be
>> included. Some might call this the "Microsoft domino effect".
>>
>> If you can create a debug build, I expect that 'spot' would be able to
>> identify the offending code which makes Mozilla slow. It was spot-on
>> for my own application.
>>
>
> More along the lines of, when YouTube loads, the animation is very
> jaggy; when videos play, the video play back (even will fully
> downloaded) is jaggy and out of sink.
>
> I'm wondering if it is my graphics card, because I have enough memory
> (2.5GB) and the CPU should be more than powerful enoug (3.2Ghz P4).
>
> Matthew
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
>
