On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 22:15 -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:11 PM, Kaiwai Gardiner
> <kaiwai.gardiner at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 19:40 -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> >  > On Mon, 28 Apr 2008, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> >  >
> >  > > Sorry to hijack this thread but the performance of Firefox 3.0beta5
> >  > > has been painful to say the least - I haven't seen the same sort of
> >  > > performance issues as I did with 2.0.14 - oh, and for some reason
> >  > > Flash seems to be a major lag creating performance killer - or is
> >  > > that just normal for Flash on *NIX?
> >  >
> >  > What sort of performace problems are you seeing?   Is it possible that
> >  > since this is Beta software it has many internal diagnostics and
> >  > validation logic enabled in order to try to find any inconsistencies?
> >  > If so, that would make it slower.
> >  >
> >  > The other issue is of course that almost every major software release
> >  > is slower than the one that came before.  The number of necessary
> >  > shared libraries tends to multiply like Gerbils since everyone wants
> >  > their small contribution (requiring another huge library) to be
> >  > included.  Some might call this the "Microsoft domino effect".
> >  >
> >  > If you can create a debug build, I expect that 'spot' would be able to
> >  > identify the offending code which makes Mozilla slow.  It was spot-on
> >  > for my own application.
> >
> >  More along the lines of, when YouTube loads, the animation is very
> >  jaggy; when videos play, the video play back (even will fully
> >  downloaded) is jaggy and out of sink.
> >
> >  I'm wondering if it is my graphics card, because I have enough memory
> >  (2.5GB) and the CPU should be more than powerful enoug (3.2Ghz P4).
> 
> Have you checked your Xorg.0.log to make sure an accelerated video
> driver is loading?
> 
> Sounds like what Solaris was like for me when I was using the standard
> "nv" driver instead of the nVidia one.

I've got a ATI Radeon X300 (PCIe) - so it'll be the standard Xorg radeon
one. the same sort of skipping didn't occur when I ran Fedora 8.

Matthew


Reply via email to