On Wed, 2009-04-01 at 17:06 -0400, Sebastien Roy wrote: > A tangential question: Placing the build number in the name of the > incorporation is curiously different than how the "entire" incorporation > is put together. Why not have a "vermillion" incorporation that has > different version numbers corresponding to different build numbers?
Good question, I'm not sure. My guess would be that it helps QA make sure they are testing the build that they are supposed to test. Laca
