> Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > Bob Palowoda wrote: > > > >>> Artem: > >>> > >>> Just because two users have complained doesn't > >>> necessarily mean that > >>> this will be a high call generator. > >>> > >> Actually my original question was related to the > document GPL-LGPLArchRules.html. > >> Is it a proprietary document? > >> > > > > Yes, the current form is unfortunately labeled Sun > Confidential. > > It's also currently wrong about several things, due > to changes > > since it was written in 2001 (such as Solaris being > open sourced), > > which is one of the reasons a new set of rules is > being drafted - > > hopefully those will be publically publishable. > > > > > If solaris is GPLed, > there is no problem to integrate libcdio back. > > when GPLV3 will be ready? >
I'm sorry my question was answered and I can understand that some changes and legal procedures must take place to get the library back into the distribution. I hope it doesn't take a brown nose to change the license to accomplish the goal but by all means go for it. ---Bob This message posted from opensolaris.org
