On 31/10/2007, Jerry Tan <Jerry.Tan at sun.com> wrote: > Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > Bob Palowoda wrote: > > > >>> Artem: > >>> > >>> Just because two users have complained doesn't > >>> necessarily mean that > >>> this will be a high call generator. > >>> > >> Actually my original question was related to the document > >> GPL-LGPLArchRules.html. > >> Is it a proprietary document? > >> > > > > Yes, the current form is unfortunately labeled Sun Confidential. > > It's also currently wrong about several things, due to changes > > since it was written in 2001 (such as Solaris being open sourced), > > which is one of the reasons a new set of rules is being drafted - > > hopefully those will be publically publishable. > > > > > If solaris is GPLed, > there is no problem to integrate libcdio back.
Incorrect. It still creates a problem for consumers of the library. It has nothing to do with Solaris being GPL. > when GPLV3 will be ready? The license is ready; the community is not. It isn't Sun's decision to make. -- Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/ "We don't have enough parallel universes to allow all uses of all junction types--in the absence of quantum computing the combinatorics are not in our favor..." --Larry Wall
