Shawn Walker wrote:
> Despite your interesting conspiracy theories there are a number of
> reasons why your assertions are false:
>
> Quite frankly, your sniping and condemnation is not reasonable and has
> no place here.
The flip side which I'll iterate again is that it's making a bad
impression for users who demand an open system.  To call me
irresponsible for bringing up an issue which you admit yourself is a
problem, simply concretes my theories that Sun wants to control how we
act and what we say, especially when it pertains to their products.  The
issue is with their products, and this is a quite draconian request to
silence people such as myself for stirring up a beehive.  You should
respect all feedback as long as it isn't blatantly degrading your image
without reason, and there's more than enough reason here to be concerned
with Sun's lack of transparency.

Not even a peep comes from the top of the snake about this problem, and
anyone that can be construed to be a Sun employee or lackey reminds me
of why I hate dealing with any customer support for any major carrier of
any service in any industry.  Blame the customer, shoot his head off and
bury the news, it's all the same and Sun has not changed like they want
people to believe.

I clearly understand NDAs and closed blobs as well as right to privacy
on stack traces and custom system configuration files, etc., but this is
just ludicrous when bugs are removed without even a placeholder or
public message to say why and IF it will ever be put back into reach by
the people that don't have a ultra super power ranger department of Sun
defense biometric access card.

It was not my intention to condemn Sun but I respectfully deny any
responsibility for irrefutably tarnishing their image, when the matter
of the discussion clearly revolves around information, or lack thereof. 
Nothing even useful to be made available when such bugs are known about
is an asinine event and a PR problem, but is also a quality control and
public perspective concern about how Sun does business.

James

Reply via email to