Hi Karel, I've got no problems when compiling Wine 1.1.7 - 1.1.14 on OpenSolaris 2008.05 and 2008.11. I've tried SXDE snv_78 with Wine 1.1.2 and it did work too.
I've got some instructions here: http://wood.sandbox.cz/osol/wine.inc.txt Please ignore everything before lines with "pfexec pkg install". You can also ignore # wine 1.1.5 fix. Cheers Hark Karel Gardas wrote: > Hello, > I'm wondering if it is possible to get nearly latest development Wine package > (1.1.13) working on older OpenSolaris like Solaris Express Developer Edition > 1/08 is. I've tried to grab SFEwine, follow it and apply related patches to > the uncompresses wine-1.1.13 tree. (I've never tried SFE<package> build) and > then I attempted manual build by: > ./tools/wineinstall > > but this fails with: > uuid.c:111: warning: visibility attribute not supported in this > configuration; ignored > uuid.c:111: warning: visibility attribute not supported in this > configuration; ignored > rm -f libuuid.a > ar rc libuuid.a uuid.o > ranlib libuuid.a > `libdinput.def.a' is up to date. > ../../tools/winegcc/winegcc -B../../tools/winebuild -shared ./acledit.spec > main.o -o acledit.dll.so -lkernel32 > ../../libs/port/libwine_port.a -lsocket -lnsl > Undefined first referenced > symbol in file > RaiseException ../../dlls/winecrt0/libwinecrt0.a(stub.o) > DisableThreadLibraryCalls main.o > ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to acledit.dll.so > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > winegcc: gcc failed > *** Error code 2 > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `acledit.dll.so' > Current working directory /tmp/wine-1.1.13/dlls/acledit > *** Error code 1 > The following command caused the error: > cd acledit && make > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `acledit' > Current working directory /tmp/wine-1.1.13/dlls > *** Error code 1 > The following command caused the error: > cd dlls && make > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `dlls' > > Compilation failed, aborting install. > > > Do anybody here have an idea what's the culprit here? > > Thanks, > Karel
