On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Jim Walker <James.Walker at sun.com> wrote:
> Shawn Walker wrote:
>  > On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Jim Walker <James.Walker at sun.com> 
> wrote:
>  >> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>  >>  >> Yes core on ASSERT should be disabled before any product release.  The
>  >>  >> intention is to uncover these subtle bugs during development so that
>  >>  >> they won't lead to subtle errors in the product.
>  >>  >
>  >>  > So that sounds like they should always be disabled in the Nevada builds
>  >>  > of JDS and only enabled in the Vermilion builds, since we're making
>  >>  > "products" like SXDE & Indiana out of many Nevada builds (and once the
>  >>  > Indiana repos are going, basically all of them).
>  >>
>  >>  I agree. The current OpenSolaris releases should be considered product
>  >>  releases and desktop stability overrides uncovering minor bugs
>  >>  especially when thousands of people are impacted.
>  >>
>  >>  The JDS team could push out there own "beta test versions" if they want,
>  >>  but the main path stuff should be product release quality all the time.
>  >
>  > The only problem I see with this is that it reduces the ability to get
>  > good test feedback.
>  >
>  > While FCS quality all the time is a great thing to have, the
>  > OpenSolaris releases are test releases for all intents and purposes
>  > from my understanding.
>
>  I for one am very interested in good test feedback. The problem here
>  is this crosses the line and will hurt us more than help us. First
>  time "users" aren't going to put up with multiple desktop crashes.
>  Maybe we need an even odd release approach like gnome, or other
>  method to get the right test feedback verses stable product balance.

A release targeted at "first time users" or those expecting a 100%
stable environment might be needed then.

I can see the possible issue here: You can't adequately test a new
release without sufficient users, and you can't get sufficient users
because users don't *really* want to test :-)

I wonder if there is some way to distribute the "stable" GNOME release
and the "latest and greatest" release or let the user choose between
them.

-- 
Shawn Walker, Software and Systems Analyst
http://binarycrusader.blogspot.com/

"To err is human -- and to blame it on a computer is even more so." -
Robert Orben

Reply via email to