I'd more or less go along the lines of what Derek proposed, something simple 
which makes the function of the repository clear.

As for the actual naming I don't think "extra" is accurate in the context of 
the overall desktop becasue to me that gives a stronger than desired leaning 
towards "optional", which is not really the situation in terms of having full 
desktop functionality. Additionally there is a partial naming conflict with SFE.

"desktop-other" or "desktop-additional" seem more logical for loose depenedency 
where specific applications will not be present if omitted, or 
"desktop-other-required" or "desktop-additional-required" for strong 
dependencies where build/runtime dependencies exist.

- Hugh
 
 
This message posted from opensolaris.org

Reply via email to