On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:57:59AM +1300, Glynn Foster wrote:

> I don't unfortunately - Danek or Stephen would know. Guys, the desktop
> team are thinking about re-organizing their spec-files repository in
> preparation for some of the Indiana (and subsequently not necessarily
> Desktop) related packages. I suggested one way of going about it is
> mirroring the likely categories in IPS. Thoughts?

I wouldn't constrain yourself by the way the packages end up being named.
It might be marginally useful, but I expect that there'd be pressure to
diverge over time.

The discussion on actual names seems to have started with the X packages
(on an internal mailing list, sorry), but that's certainly not nailed down
yet.  I expect we'll ramp up these discussions and start including other
consolidations over the next couple of weeks.

Danek

Reply via email to