Is the concern with Internal Sun Users or Opensolaris? For internal Sun users, from vermillion_52b (built on snv_51) due today, they'll be required to use snv_51. We'll also need to strip out the HAL stuff from these install scripts.
For Opensolaris, we may need to make packages available, or wait till SX based on nevada_53, as I expect snv_51 and snv_52 will be NoGO's for SX due to Desktop issues with HAL/Vold and gnome2.14. So we may have difficulty here. What are the kernel issues? we didn't see these making earlier HAL packages available? -Karl. Ghee Teo wrote: > Damien Carbery wrote: >> I assume you are talking about the lack of HAL installation steps. >> Unfortunately we're at a 'border case' type place - HAL is now in >> Nevada (snv_51) and this JDS build will be installed on top of it. >> Including HAL packages would overwrite those official packages and >> that would not be good. >> >> I am open to suggestions from people about how to accommodate those >> who do not have access to snv_51. Maybe I could upload the (official) >> HAL packages from snv_51. >> > My concern is that that may not be sufficient if there are also kernel > changes. CC Artem > > -Ghee >> >> >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> _______________________________________________ >> desktop-discuss mailing list >> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org >> > > _______________________________________________ > desktop-discuss mailing list > desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
