Damien Carbery wrote: >> I was referring to the whole OS as a complete >> solution being available. You aught to know >> that I'm not the only one that finds your >> overboard pedantic risk analysis is driving your >> company further down, especially the image. No >> one takes you seriously. >> > I'll try not to take your frustration personally. > > We feel the impact of that risk analysis internally and the desktop team has > had to do a number of rebuilds to satisfy the instructions of those risk > analysts. > > > This message posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > desktop-discuss mailing list > desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org If you wanna play with the big guys you gotta take risk. Hire me and fire your brick "laywers" they're stagnating progress. Though seriously I bet you feel it, you have to work with the documentation, code, blood sucking lawyers and other sun employees on the most pointless issues day in and day out. The most transparent part of OpenSolaris so far is JDS, mainly because GNOME has already done most the legal considerations for you. I'm not one to demand the whole lot be opened but there are particular areas of distribution which I feel are lacking direction and communicating bad images to your customers and users. What I said was aimed at Sun at the corporate level.
James
