Hi Willi,

Thanks for reporting this duplicate libraries. It seems that this bug 
was generated by accident when I made the Firefox 3.0u1 build. Will 
upload a new one then.

Willi Burmeister wrote:
> Hi Alfred,
>
> first I would like to say thanks for your great work to make
> firefox 3 available in Solaris 10.
>
> Yesterday I unpacked your new firefox tarball, and in the depend dir
> I found all extra libraries twice:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> 519151 -rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  234568 Jul 18 10:44 libatk-1.0.so.0*
> 519152 -rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  234568 Jul 18 10:44 libatk-1.0.so.0.2009.1*
> 519153 -rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  914644 Jul 18 10:44 libcairo.so.2*
> 519154 -rwxr-xr-x   1 root root  914644 Jul 18 10:44 libcairo.so.2.11.6*
> ...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Symbolic links would save a lot of space :-)
>
> For firefox 3.0 you had uploaded these depend libs in a extra tarball.
> Why are they back in the firefox tarball with ff-3.0.1? I think updates
> are easier if there are smaller packages.
>   
I didn't provide a separate tarball for the depend libs for Firefox 3.0. 
It's also in the same one. I just feel that to make all the stuff in one 
file is easier for the new comer to use it correctly.
> Maybe you could tell us something about the version numbers of the
> libraries:
>
>   /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.700.3                [1.7.3 - 139968 bytes]
>   
This is the system one.
>                            ^^^^^
>   depend/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.2009.1             [x.x.x - 234568 bytes]
>   
This is the one that provided by Sun contributed builds.
>                              ^^^^^^
>   /opt/firefox3deps/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0.901.0   [1.9.1 - 415988 bytes]
>   
And this one is from TJHSST.

Just noticed that you have the tarball from Sun and the depend package 
from TJHSST. I'm not sure whether they can work together. My 
recommendation is to stick with one build, either Sun's contributed 
builds or TJHSST.
>                                         ^^^^^
>
> I'm a bit surprized about these numbers.
>   
I'm not familiar with the number too. Just modify the spec for those 
dependent libraries and build them on Solaris 10. Anyone could help 
explain this?

Thanks,
-Alfred
>
> Thanks again and greetings from germany
>
> Willi
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-discuss mailing list
> desktop-discuss at opensolaris.org
>   


Reply via email to