> To my own surprise I haven't seen any complaints related to the switch from 127.0.0.1 to 127.0.1.1, even though I have been following AskUbuntu and ubuntuforums.
It's possible that a large portion of Ubuntu users that are using dnsmasq as a DNS server, only use LTS releases, so complains might only show up after 2 years. E.g. in 300 schools here we settled with disabling the nm-spawned dnsmasq from NetworkManager.conf, and haven't seen the implemented solution yet. Btw please don't backport the current solution to Precise, the "bind-interfaces" part will break all those existing setups. The nss-based solution does sound like it wouldn't cause any problems at all, though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting Status in “djbdns” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “dnsmasq” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “pdns-recursor” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “pdnsd” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “djbdns” source package in Precise: Confirmed Status in “dnsmasq” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “network-manager” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “pdns-recursor” source package in Precise: Invalid Status in “pdnsd” source package in Precise: Invalid Bug description: As described in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-p-dns- resolving, network manager now starts a dnsmasq instance for local DNS resolving. That breaks the default bind9 and dnsmasq installations, for people that actually want to install a DNS server. Having to manually comment out "#dns=dnsmasq" in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf doesn't sound good, and if it stays that way, it should be moved to the bind9 and dnsmasq postinst scripts. Please make network-manager smarter so that it checks if bind9 or dnsmasq are installed, so that it doesn't start the local resolver in that case. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
