I wrote in comment #131: > What benefits would the nm-dns module or the enhanced > dns module give us relative to what we have now? One is: > the ability to run nm-dnsmasq on another port, freeing up > port 53 for BIND named listening on ALL:53. What else?
I just installed bind9 and was surprised to see that in its default configuration named behaves just like dnsmasq in bind-dynamic mode. That is, it listens on port 53 at all addresses assigned to interfaces. When interfaces are created or configured, named starts listening on those as well. With this behavior, it shouldn't often (ever?) be necessary to configure named to listen on the wildcard address. Is there any nameserver out there that does still conflict with nm- dnsmasq listening at 127.0.1.1:53? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959037 Title: NM-controlled dnsmasq prevents other DNS servers from starting Status in “djbdns” package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in “dnsmasq” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “network-manager” package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in “pdns-recursor” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “pdnsd” package in Ubuntu: Invalid Status in “djbdns” source package in Precise: Confirmed Status in “dnsmasq” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “network-manager” source package in Precise: Triaged Status in “pdns-recursor” source package in Precise: Invalid Status in “pdnsd” source package in Precise: Invalid Bug description: As described in https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/foundations-p-dns- resolving, network manager now starts a dnsmasq instance for local DNS resolving. That breaks the default bind9 and dnsmasq installations, for people that actually want to install a DNS server. Having to manually comment out "#dns=dnsmasq" in /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf doesn't sound good, and if it stays that way, it should be moved to the bind9 and dnsmasq postinst scripts. Please make network-manager smarter so that it checks if bind9 or dnsmasq are installed, so that it doesn't start the local resolver in that case. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/djbdns/+bug/959037/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~desktop-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
