On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 6:56:17 PM UTC+2, Daniel Roesler wrote: > <rant> > > I'm not disappointed at all in ZTE. This phone is dirt cheap, so what > > can you expect for support? For $80, I definitely expected to be > > hacking constantly to get it working. > > > > The one I am very disappointed in is Mozilla. > > > > The ZTE Open is their flagship phone and there are many more of them > > out there than any other Firefox OS phone. If developers got a bad > > taste from that device, they would like write off Firefox OS as a > > flop. > > > > I expected Mozilla to be hacking right along side us, but it's almost > > as if no one at Mozilla even owns a ZTE Open or can confirm that the > > problems we are experiencing since 1.1 even exist. > > > > Why should I have to file a bug report about the reboot loop issue? > > This is a blocking bug that prevents app developers (for the most > > popular phone) from upgrading to more recent versions. Not only should > > it have existed, it should have been marked as critical. > > > > Also, why do we have to download Eduardo's modified boot image (thanks > > for that, by the way)? There should be a build patch/script that > > unpacks and modifies the ZTE official boot.img to get a compatible > > boot.img. > > > > Anyway, extremely disappointed in Mozilla. The lack of developer > > support for the ZTE Open will probably be the poison pill that kills > > Firefox OS's momentum. > > </rant> >
AFAIC Daniel is 100% right though ZTE's secrecy on everything regarding this stupid phone which *they* marketed as a developer phone on eBay is plain idiotic. Where is the partner? _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list dev-b2g@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g