There is a follow-up bug
980899<https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=980899>.
I've informed the owner already.
Please remove patch
Update-callbacks-to-match-bluetooth.h.patch<https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/lf/b2g/build/tree/patch/all/gecko/Update-callbacks-to-match-bluetooth.h.patch>
before
they updated repository.
As far as I know, this patch was added only in master branch (from caf)
instead of 1.3 branch.

See: https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/lf/b2g/build/tree/

On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Alexandre Lissy <ali...@mozilla.com> wrote:

> This also seems to prevent from building 1.3 which I need to fix voicemail
> notification.
>
> Marco Chen a écrit:
> >>> It's not a good way to patch gecko code> I agree with Shawn.
> > And for my experience, I had tried to propose the "patch" mechanism and
> reviewer strongly rejected it.
> > The reason is that "all patch should be reviewed well then commit into
> repository"
> > Then I kept this principle when I reviewed other devices manifest.
> >
> > If this is a case we allowed then I can't say no for following requests
> from partner.
> > Do we allow it?
> >
> > ----- 原始郵件 -----
> > 寄件者: "Shawn Huang" <shawnjoh...@gmail.com>
> > 收件者: dev-b2g@lists.mozilla.org
> > 寄件備份: 2014 3 月 8 星期六 上午 12:37:43
> > 主旨: Re: [b2g] Master hamachi build failure> On Saturday, March 1, 2014
> 12:19:06 AM UTC+8, Shawn Huang wrote:>> On Friday, February 28, 2014
> 11:09:48 PM UTC+8, Sotaro Ikeda wrote:
> >>
> >> I don't know why. Since hamachi is ICS based and still uses bluez as
> the bluetooth stack. This patch is not necessary for hamachi, now only
> JB/KK uses bluedroid as the bt stack. I think you can delete the patch
> locally. It looks like caf has their own modification for bluetooth HAL
> header files, and since we followed AOSP bluetooth HAL (at least I think we
> shall follow aosp HAL), caf tries to patch our gecko code to match their
> HAL headers. Auto patch failed because recently change file path in bug
> 972732.> It's not a good way to patch gecko code, especially HAL headers
> changed and patches are under device/qcom/b2g_common/patch/all/gecko. How
> do we handle this kind of HAL changes? Can anyone please enlighten me? How
> do we choose to support AOSP HAL or CAF HAL?
>
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
dev-b2g@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to