(I want to avoid entangling the dom/webidl plan with this discussion, which is why I forked the thread)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Ehsan Akhgari <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>wrote: > Following up on this, people asked us to not abuse the superreview flag for > this purpose If this is "abuse", doesn't that demonstrate that the super-review policy is pretty much irrelevant to the modern world, and should be changed or removed? This rule seems like a textbook use for the sr? flag, aside from the fact that the reviewers must be DOM peers and not people from [1]. But that list is pretty out of date - there are several people who haven't touched Gecko in over 3 years, and our WebAPI tech lead isn't on the list. It seems like we should either update the list, or remove it. bholley [1] http://www.mozilla.org/hacking/reviewers.html
_______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list dev-b2g@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
