If we just want to have a later release, emulator-x86-KK has been worked on for this. If we would like to put the efforts on emulator porting for the newer android version, it seem to be better to spend efforts on the latest one. If we don't want to use the latest Android Version(M), what is different between using KK and using L or what features force us to use L?
Thanks, Ken On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:16 PM, David Scravaglieri < [email protected]> wrote: > Next step for Aries will be to move to L so yes, I think we need L port. > > --- > David Scravaglieri > Mozilla - Firefox OS > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Fabrice Desré <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 10/06/2015 08:03 AM, Ken Chang wrote: >> > Since Marshmellow is released today, will we still use Android L for the >> > release in May 2016? If not, it seems that we don't get any benefit on >> > doing Emulator-x86-L for that. >> >> Given that we currently only run emulator tests on ICS (!!), yes running >> emulator-L would be a big progress. And we don't even have M ports yet, >> right? >> >> Fabrice >> -- >> Fabrice Desré >> b2g team >> Mozilla Corporation >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
