+1 to Justin. On 3 Nov 2015 08:14, "Justin D'Arcangelo" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think we should just do a better job of documenting and explaining what > NGA is. It would be nice to have a central place to go where people can > learn about the app architecture as well as get links to all the related JS > libraries we have developed like ServiceWorkerWare, Bridge.js, etc. > > Also, if contributors are more aware of NGA, it is actually clearer and > less verbose to just say “NGA” versus “separation of view logic”, which is > actually somewhat vague. Pretty much every good app architecture involves > “separation of view logic” and the migration to NGA is much more than just > separating view logic. Another way to look at it is, if we were migrating > apps to an existing 3rd-party framework like Angular or React, we would > likely be referencing the framework/architecture by its name when we talk > about it. > > I just think if we had better documentation to call out what NGA is, this > would be a non-issue. Perhaps once we get together to recap the NGA work > from v2.5, we can talk about putting together a simple GH-pages website > with documentation, libraries and a downloadable skeleton project for > building new “NGA” apps. > > -Justin > > > On Nov 2, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Tim Guan-tin Chien <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I would like to know what David and Vivien think. > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Candice Serran <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Agreed...the team working on the entire NGA program will be conducting a >> retrospective and plan forward next week (Nov 9-Nov 13). We'll make sure >> specific actions regarding the overall program are explicitly communicated >> and broken out. >> >> Thanks! >> >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Wilfred Mathanaraj <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> That would definitely help internally as well - plus it would valuable >>> for us to understand all the outstanding tasks and plan ahead for the >>> completion of work. >>> >>> Wilfred >>> >>> --- >>> FxOS Product Management >>> Mozilla Corp., UK >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 12:00, Michael Henretty <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I suggest that we stop using the term NGA when talking about feature >>> work in Gaia. The problem is that there are many facets to NGA, and using >>> that term only confuses what we are actually working on. So in the future, >>> instead of saying that we landed NGA in the SMS app for instance, let's say >>> "we landed separation of view logic and threads.js in SMS." This is much >>> more contributor friendly, and even helps core developers understand what >>> is truly being worked on. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michael >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Candice Serran >> Sr Mgr - FxOS Engineering Pgm Mgmt >> [email protected] >> irc: cserran >> mobile: 303.588.1101 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
