Spark, Ignite, NGA, Mulet, PVT... code names work well only if there's an easy 
way to discover what each name stands for. I'd prefer that we use less opaque 
names, but I think a more accessible glossary and wiki would be equally useful. 
Google had a centralized user-editable glossary of terms; we might benefit from 
something similar as well, e.g. have acronyms in Bugzilla fields automatically 
hover-link toward the glossary page. 

> On Nov 2, 2015, at 8:44 PM, Justin D'Arcangelo <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> I think we should just do a better job of documenting and explaining what NGA 
> is. It would be nice to have a central place to go where people can learn 
> about the app architecture as well as get links to all the related JS 
> libraries we have developed like ServiceWorkerWare, Bridge.js, etc.
> 
> Also, if contributors are more aware of NGA, it is actually clearer and less 
> verbose to just say “NGA” versus “separation of view logic”, which is 
> actually somewhat vague. Pretty much every good app architecture involves 
> “separation of view logic” and the migration to NGA is much more than just 
> separating view logic. Another way to look at it is, if we were migrating 
> apps to an existing 3rd-party framework like Angular or React, we would 
> likely be referencing the framework/architecture by its name when we talk 
> about it.
> 
> I just think if we had better documentation to call out what NGA is, this 
> would be a non-issue. Perhaps once we get together to recap the NGA work from 
> v2.5, we can talk about putting together a simple GH-pages website with 
> documentation, libraries and a downloadable skeleton project for building new 
> “NGA” apps.
> 
> -Justin
> 
> 
>> On Nov 2, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Tim Guan-tin Chien <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I would like to know what David and Vivien think.
>> 
>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 12:11 AM, Candice Serran <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Agreed...the team working on the entire NGA program will be conducting a 
>>> retrospective and plan forward next week (Nov 9-Nov 13). We'll make sure 
>>> specific actions regarding the overall program are explicitly communicated 
>>> and broken out.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 6:13 AM, Wilfred Mathanaraj <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> That would definitely help internally as well - plus it would valuable for 
>>>> us to understand all the outstanding tasks and plan ahead for the 
>>>> completion of work.
>>>> 
>>>> Wilfred
>>>> 
>>>> ---
>>>> FxOS Product Management
>>>> Mozilla Corp., UK
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2 Nov 2015, at 12:00, Michael Henretty <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I suggest that we stop using the term NGA when talking about feature work 
>>>>> in Gaia. The problem is that there are many facets to NGA, and using that 
>>>>> term only confuses what we are actually working on. So in the future, 
>>>>> instead of saying that we landed NGA in the SMS app for instance, let's 
>>>>> say "we landed separation of view logic and threads.js in SMS." This is 
>>>>> much more contributor friendly, and even helps core developers understand 
>>>>> what is truly being worked on.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> dev-fxos mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dev-fxos mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Candice Serran
>>> Sr Mgr - FxOS Engineering Pgm Mgmt
>>> [email protected]
>>> irc: cserran
>>> mobile: 303.588.1101
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dev-fxos mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> dev-fxos mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dev-fxos mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
_______________________________________________
dev-fxos mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos

Reply via email to