Also what's the deal with this fork we're reading about in the press, the chinese H5OS. Will this dilute or help the efforts that push Firefox OS forward?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Naoki Hirata <[email protected]> wrote: > "...And it does not have any provisions for EME or other types of DRM..." > - djf > "The TV team says that the TV app is important for them, which is why > it's high on the list." - Fabrice > > I don't know what the landscape is.. but what if TV was planning to use > Video for streaming? Would that change the landscape? > > Also to note, payments is shutting down as far as I understand; having > said that if we're to go about the streaming route, would that revive that > project? > > Not saying that any of this is or is not happening. Just curious. > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Nino Vranešič <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> David, >>> >>> This is a valid point. If merging Video with Gallery is your plan, let's >>> do it, we just discussed this in meeting and there is an agreement to move >>> forward with that. >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> Best regards, Nino V. >> >> >> 2015-12-11 19:47 GMT+01:00 David Scravaglieri <[email protected]> >> : >> >>> David, >>> >>> This is a valid point. If merging Video with Gallery is your plan, let's >>> do it, we just discussed this in meeting and there is an agreement to move >>> forward with that. >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> David Scravaglieri >>> Mozilla - Firefox OS >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:39 PM, David Flanagan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm concerned that the Video app is number 3 on this list. This is the >>>> app that we've been talking about dropping for some time now, with the idea >>>> that users can just use the Gallery app to view videos. >>>> >>>> The video app we have now is only good for playing videos that are >>>> stored locally on a device. It does not do streaming video and it does not >>>> have any kind of connection to an iTunes or google play type service where >>>> users can buy or rent videos. And it does not have any provisions for EME >>>> or other types of DRM. >>>> >>>> If the thought is that connected devices aneed medwill a streaming >>>> functionality, then that obviously should be a high priority, but the Video >>>> app we have currently will be pretty much useless for that and should not >>>> be listed as priority #3. >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> As a follow up from the recent announcements, I’d like to provide an >>>>> update about May’16 release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> May’16 release is still part of our plan of record and that Smart TVs >>>>> and Smartphones will be still part of the scope of this release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The overall goals for May’16 release will remain valid especially with >>>>> regards to quality, foxfooding growth and limited feature content. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In addition there is an on-going activity to ensure that all the >>>>> initiatives that are part of the content of this release will be still >>>>> relevant to achieve the high level goals mentioned above. This will also >>>>> mean that some of the initiatives will need to be re-adjusted/adapted in >>>>> order to better fit into the future broader context of connected devices. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As a follow up from Wednesday's meeting, I would also like to propose >>>>> the following applications priority. Proposal is based on applications >>>>> relevance towards connected devices hence the reason why settings and >>>>> system apps represent a high priority for 2.6 release: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1. *Settings* >>>>> 2. *System Apps* >>>>> 3. Video >>>>> 4. Music >>>>> 5. Gallery >>>>> 6. Camera >>>>> 7. Contacts >>>>> 8. Email >>>>> 9. SMS >>>>> 10. Dialer >>>>> 11. Marketplace (if core OS changes are needed) >>>>> 12. Calendar >>>>> 13. Clock >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is increasingly important that May’16 release remains in our plan >>>>> of record in order to support the transition towards connected devices. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Andrea >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dev-fxos mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dev-fxos mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
