Ah! Thanks for the clarification! FYI, Payments is going to be discontinued. You may end up having to reinstate/repurpose it if there's pay per view content on the streams.
Is there a consideration for Shumway? Would be interesting if we're the only web tv to have flash enabled apps runnning. I think it would give us an advantage if we got it all working and integrated well. On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Josh Cheng <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Dec 15, 2015, at 12:42 AM, Naoki Hirata <[email protected]> wrote: > > "...And it does not have any provisions for EME or other types of DRM..." > - djf > "The TV team says that the TV app is important for them, which is why > it's high on the list." - Fabrice > > I don't know what the landscape is.. but what if TV was planning to use > Video for streaming? Would that change the landscape? > > Hi Naoki, > > We are currently working from both side regarding media app on TV. > Gaia media team is working on investigating whether it’s feasible to merge > Video and Gallery with streaming capability. > Platform team is working on integrating AOSP DRM framework from both > hardware and software aspect. > These action items are both planned as P1 for TV program in 2.6 > > Cheers, > Josh > Engineering Program Manager, Firefox OS > > > Also to note, payments is shutting down as far as I understand; having > said that if we're to go about the streaming route, would that revive that > project? > > Not saying that any of this is or is not happening. Just curious. > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Nino Vranešič <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> David, >>> >>> This is a valid point. If merging Video with Gallery is your plan, let's >>> do it, we just discussed this in meeting and there is an agreement to move >>> forward with that. >> >> >> +1 >> >> >> Best regards, Nino V. >> >> >> 2015-12-11 19:47 GMT+01:00 David Scravaglieri <[email protected]> >> : >> >>> David, >>> >>> This is a valid point. If merging Video with Gallery is your plan, let's >>> do it, we just discussed this in meeting and there is an agreement to move >>> forward with that. >>> >>> >>> >>> --- >>> David Scravaglieri >>> Mozilla - Firefox OS >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 1:39 PM, David Flanagan <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm concerned that the Video app is number 3 on this list. This is the >>>> app that we've been talking about dropping for some time now, with the idea >>>> that users can just use the Gallery app to view videos. >>>> >>>> The video app we have now is only good for playing videos that are >>>> stored locally on a device. It does not do streaming video and it does not >>>> have any kind of connection to an iTunes or google play type service where >>>> users can buy or rent videos. And it does not have any provisions for EME >>>> or other types of DRM. >>>> >>>> If the thought is that connected devices aneed medwill a streaming >>>> functionality, then that obviously should be a high priority, but the Video >>>> app we have currently will be pretty much useless for that and should not >>>> be listed as priority #3. >>>> >>>> David >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Andrea Aime <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> As a follow up from the recent announcements, I’d like to provide an >>>>> update about May’16 release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> May’16 release is still part of our plan of record and that Smart TVs >>>>> and Smartphones will be still part of the scope of this release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The overall goals for May’16 release will remain valid especially with >>>>> regards to quality, foxfooding growth and limited feature content. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In addition there is an on-going activity to ensure that all the >>>>> initiatives that are part of the content of this release will be still >>>>> relevant to achieve the high level goals mentioned above. This will also >>>>> mean that some of the initiatives will need to be re-adjusted/adapted in >>>>> order to better fit into the future broader context of connected devices. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As a follow up from Wednesday's meeting, I would also like to propose >>>>> the following applications priority. Proposal is based on applications >>>>> relevance towards connected devices hence the reason why settings and >>>>> system apps represent a high priority for 2.6 release: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 1. *Settings* >>>>> 2. *System Apps* >>>>> 3. Video >>>>> 4. Music >>>>> 5. Gallery >>>>> 6. Camera >>>>> 7. Contacts >>>>> 8. Email >>>>> 9. SMS >>>>> 10. Dialer >>>>> 11. Marketplace (if core OS changes are needed) >>>>> 12. Calendar >>>>> 13. Clock >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It is increasingly important that May’16 release remains in our plan >>>>> of record in order to support the transition towards connected devices. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Andrea >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> dev-fxos mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dev-fxos mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
