On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 11:25 PM, Katie Caldwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> + cd allstaff > > tif, I think this is the list you meant to include :) > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:16 PM, David Flanagan <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Here's my take on this important question: >> >> Our mission is to "promote openness, innovation and opportunity on the >> Web". Neither IoT in general nor the connected home more specifically is >> today part of the open web. But if we move quickly and aggressively enough >> into this immature market, we may have the opportunity to shape the >> technology, plant our flag and claim the connected home as part of the open >> web. And if we can pull this off, then our mission and manifesto become >> very relevant. >> >> Yes, good point, and personally I like the concept of: Firefox browser -> push the open web of documents (and services) FxOS smartphone -> push the open web of (client-side/offline-first) applications Connected Devices projects -> push the open web of things But I do feel it relates to only point d) in Jesus Muñoz's list https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.fxos/uuJeHb8CBDM/2koEMbAUCQAJ and IMHO there is more to cover than just the (in itself important) point of using web technology to make the IoT space more open. For instance, what would be the IoT-specific equivalent of goals like tracking protection, private browsing, and end-to-end encryption? The link to http://iotmanifesto.org/ from Jesus's post also has some interesting points in that respect, maybe we can use some of them as well, as part of a more Mozilla-specific list. My 2ct, Michiel. I think this is the same thing we tried to do in the smartphone market, but >> this time we've picked an industry segment that is not already so mature >> that it is hard to break in to. >> >> David >> >> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Tiffanie Shakespeare < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> + connected devices >>> >>> As part of the innovation process, we are asked to answer "why >>> Mozilla?". Something I've been struggling with while ideating is: How >>> does IoT and the connected home fit into our mission and values? Answering >>> this question would help frame our discussion and produce better solutions. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:04 AM, Michiel de Jong <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The mission of Connected Devices is "to deliver an uncompromising, User >>>> first, web centric experience via Connected Devices" (see >>>> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Connected_Devices). >>>> >>>> I would like to get a more precise idea of what we mean by this. What >>>> are the pain points? For example: >>>> >>>> * Keeping your data under your control >>>> * Security >>>> * Web apps over native apps >>>> * Interoperability >>>> * Inclusivity/Localization >>>> >>>> Maybe we can add a link to a wiki page about this? >>>> >>>> >>>> My 2ct, >>>> Michiel. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> dev-fxos mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dev-fxos mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> > > > -- > > ......................................................................................................................................................................... > *Katie Caldwell * • UX Designer / Connected Devices UX Design Team • > Portland, Oregon • IRC: KatieC > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
