Could be, but some of the other libs require installing anyway? Just
preferences I guess.
---
Robert Chalmers
http://www.quantum-radio.net.au Quantum Radio
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.inexpensivewebsites.com Domain Name Registrations
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "opensrs-dev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: Why not use CGI.pm
> I agree, but I think the reason why OpensSRS doesn't use CGI.pm is
that they
> are afraid that it is not installed?
>
> --Kit
>
> >
> > I'm wondering why CGI.pm isn't being used as follows, thus
avoiding
> > cgi-lib.pl - as well as reducing the bulk of the distribution.
I've
> > heard that cgi-lib.pl is not all that reliable in places!
> >
> >
> > ie, running this in reg_system seems to have no illeffects that I
can
> > discerne?
> >
> > #use Data::Dumper;
> > use strict;
> > use lib $PATH_LIB;
> > use RACE;
> > use CGI qw(:cgi-lib); <------------ takes
care of
> > any cgi-lib specific calls
> > #do "$PATH_LIB/cgi-lib.pl"; <------------ disabled.
> >
> > use OpenSRS::XML_Client qw(:default);
> >
> > What do other code developers think?
> >
> > Robert
> > ---
> > Robert Chalmers
> > http://www.quantum-radio.net.au Quantum Radio
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://www.inexpensivewebsites.com Domain Name Registrations
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
>
>
