Agreed.  I've never been mailing lists that were as broken as these at
OpenSRS.  Not to mention they're so slow that most people don't see their
own posts for several hours, compelling them further to CC the originator of
the message.

Jim


----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Warren" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Doug McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "OpenSRS Developers List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: Reply vs. Reply All -> Difference=0


> Then get the list fixed to use properly reply-to addresses, and then we
can
> just reply (to the list) rather then reply-to-all when we want it to go to
> the list.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Doug McDonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2001 1:49 AM
> Subject: Reply vs. Reply All -> Difference=0
>
>
> > At the risk of going on the record in Scott Allan's defense, cc'ing him
> > and/or others who post to the SRS lists accomplishes nothing other than
> > giving them 2 copies of the message.
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (as an example) gets a copy of everything you send to
> > the list. There is no need for a cc as well.
> >
> > Sorry, pet peeve of mine.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Doug McDonald
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Tucows Inc.
> > www.tucows.com
> > www.opensrs.org
> >
> > Toll free:
> > North America: 1-800-798-1114 extension 1300
> > International: 00 800 371 69922 extension 1300
> >
> >
>
>

Reply via email to