Why would you consider it a bug, this is a nice way to keep hijacking of domains away from the owner even if the owners userid/password was compromised. The person gaining access to the users account could not transfer the domain away, nor transfer DNS deligation to another group of DNS servers without getting another person (you or I) to unlock the clients domain. There by providing a two step process to moving vital parts of a domain. How often do people actually change their DNS servers anyway? Its not normally something people would do on a daily or weekly basis...
So far my clients are actually enjoying the idea of tighter security over their domains, and a two step process like this seems to give a bit more assurance that their domain will not get pulled out from under them. Anyway, off to find a cup of coffee, but I would NOT consider this a bug. On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 11:57:57 -0500 (EST) Christopher Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Mark Jeftovic wrote: > > It seems as if nameserver delegations cannot be modified with the > > registrar lock turned on. Is this intentional or a bug? > > One of those Canadians was thinking too hard again! ;-) > > I hope it's considered a bug... > > -- > </chris>
