The important thing is NO active information can be changed and cause the domain to point somewhere else. Even if they change ownership, it will still have a delay as they will have to go through the channels to try and have it un-locked. The RSP will know it's not their domain and hopefully notify the owners of what has happened.... ;)
I am glad to have what we do... Thanks Scott! (And Chuckles when your back ;) Might not be a bad idea to lock the ownership change in the future... -- Mike Allen, 4CheapDomains.Net [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.4CheapDomains.Net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "OpenSRS dev-list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:21 PM Subject: Re: domain locking > Thanks for pointing out the docs, but they do not answer the "why" > question. > Seems to me that a "lock" on a record should at least lock the admin > contact info as well as the DNS? > Perhaps this is not possible for some other reason? > Did I miss another doc? > Thanks, > Ken Anderson > Pacific.Net > > > Ken Joy wrote: > > > > As has been fully documented and referred to once or twice on the list today > > alone, locking prevents: > > > > a) registrar transfers > > b) RSP2RSP transfers > > c) DNS changes > > > > Please read the documentation before posting questions like this. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ken > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > Behalf Of Ken Anderson > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 1:46 PM > > > To: OpenSRS dev-list > > > Subject: domain locking > > > > > > > > > Okay, so domain locking can protect resellers from domain hijacking of > > > unknowing customers by NetSol and others, but it seems that it only > > > locks certain parts of the domain name record. Why is this? Is there any > > > granular control over what is/isn't locked? > > > Thanks, > > > Ken Anderson > > > Pacific.Net >
