P.P.S. Hmm spent half an hour to down the credit to zero to found out the bug described in my previous e-mail is not fixed.
In the meantime found another server side bug and complete mess happened - while it was a parallel process - the client side submit the renewals and I approve them at the RWI at one moment the RWI started telling me "cancelled duplicate order" while there couldn't be duplicates; also the client side finished with most of the renewals got errors from the server "10 years period exceeded" while they were not, plus they were sent successfully to pending orders and I approved them, (ah so long sentence, sorry for my bad English), but I'm not going to test this again to see what happened, as in real life no one will perform a 400 domain years renewal request. Now I have to find a way to put some funds at the test system.. Best regards, Doytchin Spiridonov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.WebYou.com Web Design and Development --- Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 2:28:43 AM, you wrote: D> P.S. Ah I found out how.. Strange for 2 years I never checked the D> payment status at the test system :) I was thinking the account D> balance is unlimited there.. Now I have to register several hundred D> domain years to make it 0. :) D> Best regards, D> Doytchin Spiridonov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D> http://www.WebYou.com Web Design and Development D> --- D> Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 2:19:54 AM, you wrote: D>> Hello Chris, D>> But what they did is to set up a copy of the live system. If there was D>> a domain which could be transferred millions times it wouldn't be the D>> same as in the life system as if once the domain name is in transfer D>> process it shouldn't be possible to transfer it again.. D>> By the way how could you get out of credit at the test system? I D>> really need that to test if they fixed a server side bug in the latest D>> release which happens when: a) system set to send all orders at the D>> pending list b) you are out of credit and c) someone does a renewal - D>> then the server doesn't return a transaction ID. Right now the only D>> way to test that is to run out of credit at the life system which I D>> really don't want to test that way ;) D>> Best regards, D>> Doytchin Spiridonov mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] D>> http://www.WebYou.com Web Design and Development D>> --- D>> Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 1:43:52 AM, you wrote: c>>> On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 11:34:57PM +0200, Doytchin Spiridonov wrote: >>>> Hello Joe, >>>> >>>> OK here are some: >>>> >>>> try.com >>>> try.net >>>> get.com >>>> get.net >>>> monitor.com >>>> car.com >>>> car.net >>>> >>>> etc! >>>> >>>> I would say any not so often used word should be already registered at >>>> the test system but not in active transfer (as people don't test so >>>> much the transfers :). So it should be easy for you to find several >>>> thousand domains to test with.. c>>> The point isn't that I can randomly find some domains which work c>>> *today*, the point is that domains are needed which provide c>>> predictable results for the life of the API, or there's no point c>>> writing regression tests. c>>> A further example: I ran out of credit in the testing environment, c>>> while writing my test suite - as a result, all my scripts 'broke', and c>>> I spent some fruitless time trying to 'fix' them purely as a result of c>>> test data changing. c>>> OpenSRS seem very keen on Full Access being done properly, with their c>>> RITE test and so on; they need to back this up with some useful test c>>> data in the Test environment. c>>> Chris.
