> If communications are encrypted using SSL, that eliminates the need to > do any encryption in the client code.
Does it? Or does it mean the client has to do the SSL encryption? SSL does not imply that it is an http transaction. > John Roche > einfosystems.net > > > >>Has anyone brought up the possiblity of using SSL to do the encryption > instead of using blowfish? > > > > This mail was content checked for malicious code and viruses by > GFI MailSecurity. GFI MailSecurity provides email content checking, > exploit detection and anti-virus for Exchange & SMTP servers. Email > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more information. >
