On 22 December 2009 Hartmut Henkel wrote: > seems to be a 32/64 bit issue. After sprinkling the md5.c code with 32 > bit MASKs (see diff) luatex indeed gives the correct > 098f6bcd4621d373cade4e832627b4f6 on an x86_64 AMD debian Linux PC. > Unclear which MASK made it, but i guess it's in the rotate().
Though this problem will not exist in future versions of luatex, it seems that I have to wait a few years until I can enable the MD5 code again. I simply commented it out for the time being. Not everybody has a recent version of luatex. There are systems like CentOs or Debian which still support old stuff (no package updates, only security fixes). The MD5 stuff is not essential in my script, but I'd like to use it whenever possible. Currently it's commented out. luatex provides some TeX primitives: \luatexversion \luatexrevision \luatexdatestamp However, I'm not using luatex but texlua and couldn't figure out how to access these variables in lua. If this isn't supported already, what about providing a luatex table? luatex.version luatex.revision luatex.datestamp ...and maybe even more: luatex.author, luatex.license... :) If I can evaluate, for instance, luatex.datestamp, I can enable MD5 checks in my script on sytems where it works. That would be nice. Regards, Reinhard -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reinhard Kotucha Phone: +49-511-3373112 Marschnerstr. 25 D-30167 Hannover mailto:reinhard.kotu...@web.de ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is NO. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ dev-luatex mailing list dev-luatex@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-luatex
