I've already done this work but we decided to just increase the resolution for our tegra board:
See https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688886 which includes an outdated patch that adds a screen(w,h) annotation to each test and a patch to compute the required size per test. On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Jeff Hammel <jham...@mozilla.com> wrote: > If the exact width/height could be found for each test then these could be > marked in a manifest (theoretically, not speaking to the existing reftest > manifest format per se). Then reftest could be modified to take a (e.g.) > --resoltuion 400x400 argument and the test runner passing over any test that > exceeds either dimension. > > Just a thought. Not sure how feasible this is. > > > On 08/28/2012 09:52 AM, Andrew Halberstadt wrote: >> >> == The Problem == >> >> Reftests currently assume a window size of 800x1000. This is not possible >> on mobile devices, and using this resolution on tegras and pandas consumes >> too much memory and results in many timeouts and random-failures. >> >> Changing the resolution to something like 400x400 is very stable and only >> results in a handful of failures. The problem is it's difficult to figure >> out how many tests are false positives as a result of lost coverage. >> >> See also: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737961 >> >> >> == Possible Solutions == >> >> * Somehow figure out the exact pixel width/height required by each test >> and re-write the ones that are over the new target resolution >> >> * Scroll the contentView and use multiple drawWindow calls to stitch the >> canvases together piece by piece >> >> * Disable the DRAW_WIDGET_LAYERS flag so content is rendered off screen >> (I'm under the impression this is not a valid solution) >> >> * ? >> >> Things to keep in mind: >> >> * Needed for fennec and b2g (must work oop) >> * Some of the tests are shared (apparently?) outside of mozilla >> >> >> == Feedback == >> >> I'm looking for feedback on the best way to move forward. Also, does >> anyone have any opinions on what the new target resolution should be? >> >> Andrew >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
