On Wednesday 2012-08-29 14:41 +0200, Axel Hecht wrote: > On 28.08.12 21:31, Benjamin Smedberg wrote: > >On 8/27/2012 6:34 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >>W3C is proposing a revised charter for the RDFa Working Group. For > >>more details, see: > >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2012Aug/0001.html > >>http://www.w3.org/2012/06/rdfwa-wg-charter.html > >> > >>Mozilla has the opportunity to send comments or objections through > >>this Friday, August 31. Please reply to this thread if you think > >>there's something we should say. > >I don't think we have any reason to implement these specifications. So > >our primary interest is ensuring that this spec does not cause cause > >incompatibilities with HTML as found on the internet today, and that it > >does not complicate implementations of the core HTML5 spec for user > >agents that choose not to implement RDFa. Other than perhaps making > >these notes, I think this is a decision we could easily abstain from. > > > >--BDS > > > > Agreed. > > Axel with his RDF hat on.
OK, I abstained from the review with a comment taken from what Benjamin wrote above: We expect that we will not implement these specifications. But we don't mind this work happening as long as it does not cause incompatibilities with HTML as found on the internet today, and does not complicate implementations of the core HTML5 spec for user agents that choose not to implement RDFa. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
