On 8/30/12 4:16 AM, Ms2ger wrote:
It certainly looks nicer, but I'm not a big fan of complicating the rules for assembling the C++ signature from the WebIDL. XPIDL's consistency here, IMO, saves time when implementing an interface: you can focus on the actual implementation, rather than the binding code.
One of the goals, honestly, is to have the xpidl getters look exactly like the C++ getters you'd have if you just wrote C++ getters (or for that matter like the ones you probably already have).
That is, ideally WebIDL maps to the API you'd pick for your C++ class for C++ consumers anyway.
-Boris _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
