On Mon, May 06, 2013 at 08:24:07AM -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > >I am still waiting for the rebuttal of my arguments, in the original email > >in this thread, about how TeX is strictly better than MathML for the > >particular task of representing equations. > > How easy is it to build an accessibility application on top of TeX, > or even a restricted subset of it? Note that these exist for > MathML, but not so much for TeX.
I actually think it would be easier to map tx math into the accessibility APIs we support than mathml. currently we don't expose mathml at all other than as a an object that we say is an equation, and its not really clear how to fix that with mathml. Trev > > I guess this comes down to how easy it is to construct exactly the > same parse/syntax tree out of TeX, right? > > -Boris > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
