On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Johnny Stenback <j...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Option 2 is where this discussion started (in the Tuesday meeting a few > weeks ago, > https://wiki.mozilla.org/Platform/2013-05-07#Should_we_switch_from_hg_to_git.3F). > Since then I've had a number of conversations and have been convinced > that a wholesale change is the less attractive option. The cost of a > wholesale change will be *huge* on the infrastructure end, to a point > where we need to question whether the benefits are worth the cost. I > have also spoken with other large engineering orgs about git performance > limitations, one of which is doing the opposite switch, going from git > to hg. While I don't see us hitting those limitations any time soon, I > also don't think the risk of hitting those limitations is one we want to > take in a wholesale change at this point.
Are these (cost of infra changes, possible git perf limitations) the primary reasons for discarding the move to git as the primary VCS at this point? Cheers, Dirkjan _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
