That last thing was another item I found useful in the previous life. When requesting a review from somebody, people could see "this person currently has X items in their review queue". You can ignore that information, but it's there and it may help. It's still probably simpler for the reviewer to know they're too busy, notify the author, and help them find somebody else if they can't agree on the timeframe.
On 2013-07-11, at 11:37 , Robert O'Callahan <rob...@ocallahan.org> wrote: > While I think your observations are useful, I think (hope!) you are a > massive outlier and I don't think we should design a policy based on the > assumption that your review commitments are in any way normal. > > I would be totally OK with a policy that explicitly applies to everyone > except you. Or, we could parameterize it with a dynamic list of exceptions > who are known to be overloaded with reviews. In fact, making that list > explicit and publishing it would let people know not to request reviews > from people on that list except as a last resort (which is, in fact, how I > treat you and dbaron). > > Rob > -- > Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni > le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa > stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, > 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp > waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * > * > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
