I’ve been aware of these proposals. Honestly, there’s not a lot of meat in the performance timeline proposal and one of the editors doesn’t appear to be actively involved anymore.
IMO, this is implementation detail for describing the data structures used by a timeline “entry”. I’m not sure how important a cross platform specification is, but would entertain the idea if there were good uses for it. ~ rob On Nov 26, 2013, at 05:56 , Till Schneidereit <t...@tillschneidereit.net> wrote: > I don't know how well (or if at all) the current push for performance > devtools is coordinated with these proposals, but it would certainly be > worth looking into that. > > CCing Axel Kratel. > > > On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:31 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote: > >> On 11/25/13 7:07 PM, L. David Baron wrote: >> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline/ >>> Performance Timeline >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/user-timing/ >>> User Timing >>> >> >> Have we had anyone at all review these specs? My past experience with >> that working group and set of editors doesn't make me sanguine about them >> producing specs that can actually be implemented without >> reverse-engineering IE or Chrome.... >> >> If we _haven't_ had someone look at these before, we should do that now. >> And we probably need someone whose job description includes >> sanity-checking the stuff this working group produces. >> >> -Boris >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-platform mailing list >> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform >> > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
