There are eight W3C Proposed Recommendations for RDF 1.1 (two of which are actually Proposed Edited Recommendations):
RDF Schema 1.1: W3C Proposed Edited Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
RDF 1.1 XML Syntax: W3C Proposed Edited Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
RDF 1.1 N-Quads: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/n-quads/
RDF 1.1 N-Triples: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/
RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January
2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
RDF 1.1 Semantics: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-mt/
RDF 1.1 TriG: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/trig/
RDF 1.1 Turtle: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/
There's a call for review to W3C member companies (of which Mozilla
is one) open until February 9.
If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the
review, or if you think Mozilla should voice support or opposition
to the specification, please say so in this thread. (I'd note,
however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make
comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)
My inclination is to explicitly abstain to indicate this is
something we're not interested or involved in.
-David
--
𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂
𝄢 Mozilla https://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
What I was walling in or walling out,
And to whom I was like to give offense.
- Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
