As, still, module owner of RDF, I think that's the right thing for us to do.
I haven't actually followed the development of the specs, but I'm
positive that the development of those specifications doesn't impact us
as a browser vendor. The impact of RDF is in the web application and
addons system.
Axel
On 1/14/14 11:04 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
There are eight W3C Proposed Recommendations for RDF 1.1 (two of
which are actually Proposed Edited Recommendations):
RDF Schema 1.1: W3C Proposed Edited Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/
RDF 1.1 XML Syntax: W3C Proposed Edited Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/
RDF 1.1 N-Quads: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/n-quads/
RDF 1.1 N-Triples: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/n-triples/
RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January
2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/
RDF 1.1 Semantics: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-mt/
RDF 1.1 TriG: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/trig/
RDF 1.1 Turtle: W3C Proposed Recommendation 09 January 2014
http://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/
There's a call for review to W3C member companies (of which Mozilla
is one) open until February 9.
If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the
review, or if you think Mozilla should voice support or opposition
to the specification, please say so in this thread. (I'd note,
however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make
comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)
My inclination is to explicitly abstain to indicate this is
something we're not interested or involved in.
-David
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
