On 4/14/14, 3:46 PM, David Burns wrote: > Not from my side! > > David > > On 14/04/2014 22:41, Eric Shepherd wrote: >> On 2014-04-14 21:38:24 +0000, David Burns said: >> >>> XPath is still a going concern from where I stand. Web Testing >>> people, who use Selenium WebDriver, use XPath extensively since they >>> struggle to get to have testable documents. Having decent >>> documentation for them would be awesome :) >> >> On 2014-04-14 21:38:20 +0000, Anne van Kesteren said: >> >>> I don't think we should actively recommend it. We're maintaining the >>> existing code, but are not upgrading our level of support or anything. >>> And if we could get rid of the existing code, we would. >> >> Well, there's the expected yes/no answer I was looking for. My >> inclination is to go ahead and migrate the doc and keep it in the main >> body of our documentation content, but maybe with an added notice that >> support is limited yadda yadda yadda... >> >> Any disagreements? >> >
FWIW, many add-ons use XPath. If there's anything we should be recommending add-on developers to migrate to, please let me know. Jorge _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
