On 05.06.2014 09:54, Dao wrote:
On 04.06.2014 11:45, Mike de Boer wrote:
The reason CommonJS came into view was not because of it’s semantic
superiority, but because of its similarity to both the XPCShell-test
and Mochitest assertion styles and implementation.
This way I thought we could circumvent ppl to get worried about
re-inventing the wheel or something like that and view this change as
an incremental step to gradually improve the blueprint overlap between
the test suites in use.

I don't understand. How does using CommonJS achieve this better than
making XPCShell use something based on the Mochitest API?

And by Mochitest API I meant SimpleTest, I guess...
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to