On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:33 AM, Mike de Boer <mdeb...@mozilla.com> wrote: > I want that to happen, which is most ‘cost-efficient’; if that’s moving the > implementation of `is`, `isnot`, `ise` to a separate module whilst keeping > the method names available to all Mochitest(-browser) tests, than we do that. > > If providing the SimpleTest API to XPCShell-test by aliasing the assertion > method names to the respective SimpleTest method names and not exposing the > CommonJS method names in the global scope is most ‘cost-efficient’, than we > do that.
Sounds like we have a clear path forward: adjust Assert.jsm's API to match the SimpleTest API, then continue moving forward with the plan to use Assert.jsm across mochitest/xpcshell (and deprecate the "old" xpcshell assertion methods). Shall we get some bugs on file? Gavin _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
