On 2014-07-22, 11:10 AM, Marco Chen wrote:
Hi all,
The purpose of this topic is to implement navigator.deviceStorage.
Since Ehsan agreed with this proposal already, may I close this session?
We still don't have a proposal yet, do we? It's fine to discuss this on
dev-webapi too, but the discussion is not done yet. :-)
Cheers,
Ehsan
The reason is
1. We didn't decide the resource and detail yet so I suggest to
discuss it back to dev-webapi.
And after we finalize the spec and resource, will notice
dev-platform for concrete plan and date/release.
2. About virtual device storage, will discuss it in dev-webapi as
well and back to dev-platform when we are going to implement it.
Hi Dave and Ehsan,
May I know your suggestion?
Thanks,
Sincerely yours.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*寄件者: *"Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>
*收件者: *"Marco Chen" <mc...@mozilla.com>
*副本: *dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
*寄件備份: *2014 7 月 22 星期二 上午 2:01:13
*主旨: *Re: Intent to implement: navigator.deviceStorage
Yes, indeed. Below, I meant to agree with adding a new EventTarget
where these events can be targeted to. :-)
Cheers,
Ehsan
On 2014-07-21, 12:05 PM, Marco Chen wrote:
> Yes, I agree with you for virtual device storage API.
>
> But before discussing the detail of virutal device storage api,
> the first step here is to figure out where should new event handler be
> added?
>
> Since there is not only new event handler been added but also a set of
> APIs potentially,
> I support to Dave' suggestion.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *寄件者: *"Ehsan Akhgari" <ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com>
> *收件者: *mc...@mozilla.com, dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
> *寄件備份: *2014 7 月 21 星期一 下午 11:32:33
> *主旨: *Re: Intent to implement: navigator.deviceStorage
>
> On 2014-07-20, 10:43 PM, mc...@mozilla.com wrote:
> >> Perhaps adding an
> >> EventListener on Window would be enough, so that we can keep the
> same API?
> >
> > As Dave said, we might still need to propose a set of WebAPI for
> Virutal Device Storage (Then we can have apps like dropboxstorage app,
> googledriverstorage app and sambaStorage app). If we can add
> navigator.deviceStorage then these old and new proposed APIs can be put
> together. (not sure this is a principle of designing Web API or we can
> split functions/events to different places).
>
> That sounds good, but of course we need a more concrete proposal for the
> virtual device storage API.
>
> Cheers,
> Ehsan
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
